|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-225||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether individuals whose personal information is held in a database breached by hackers have Article III standing simply by virtue of the breach even without concrete injury, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 3rd, 6th, 7th, 9th and District of Columbia Circuits have held, or whether concrete injury as a result of the breach is required for Article III standing, as the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 8th Circuits have held.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 29 2018||Application (18A13) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 19, 2018 to August 20, 2018, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jul 02 2018||Application (18A13) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until August 20, 2018.|
|Aug 20 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 21, 2018)|
|Sep 17 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 21, 2018 to October 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2018.|
|Sep 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Oct 04 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2018 to November 6, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 09 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 6, 2018.|
|Nov 06 2018||Brief of respondents Theresa Stevens, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 19 2018||Reply of petitioner Zappos.com, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Mar 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.|
|Mar 25 2019||Petition DENIED.|
Here's today's order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/011822zor_5iel.pdf
The court doesn't add any new cases to its docket, and takes no action on major pending petitions involving affirmative action in higher education & religious objections to nondiscrimination laws meant to protect LGBTQ people.
As she did last week, Sonia Sotomayor will participate in this week's arguments remotely, SCOTUS says. @NinaTotenberg reported this morning that Sotomayor's decision is the result of Neil Gorsuch's refusal to wear a mask on the bench. All other justices have agreed to wear masks.
Today at SCOTUS: The court will release orders on pending petitions at 9:30 a.m., followed by two oral arguments starting at 10 -- one on a First Amendment spat over a Boston flag policy; the other on a family's quest to reclaim an Impressionist painting taken in WWII by Nazis.
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...