|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-1226||4th Cir.||Dec 3, 2014||Mar 25, 2015||6-3||Breyer||OT 2014|
Holding: A plaintiff alleging that the denial of an accommodation constituted disparate treatment under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which requires employers to treat “women affected by pregnancy . . . the same for all employment-related purposes . . . as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work,” may make out a prima facie case by showing that she belongs to the protected class, that she sought accommodation, that the employer did not accommodate her, and that the employer did accommodate others similar in their ability or inability to work. The employer may then seek to justify its refusal to accommodate the plaintiff by relying on “legitimate, nondiscriminatory” reasons for denying accommodation.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on March 25, 2015. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgement. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Kennedy and Thomas joined. Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 8 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 10, 2013)|
|May 2 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 10, 2013.|
|May 10 2013||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors, and Women's Rights Organizations filed.|
|Jun 7 2013||Brief of respondent United Parcel Service, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 12 2013||Reply of petitioner Peggy Young filed.|
|Jun 19 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Oct 7 2013||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 19 2014||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 2 2014||Supplemental brief of petitioner Peggy Young filed.|
|Jun 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.|
|Jun 4 2014||Supplemental brief of respondent United Parcel Service, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 23 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014.|
|Jun 30 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 30, 2014.|
|Jul 1 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 18 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 4, 2014.|
|Jul 18 2014||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 24, 2014.|
|Jul 29 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jul 31 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 3, 2014.|
|Sep 4 2014||Brief of petitioner Peggy Young filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||Joint appendix filed (two Volumes). (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Sep 10 2014||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors and Women's and Civil Rights Organizations filed.|
|Sep 10 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union and A Better Balance, et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of Black Women's Health Imperative, et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce, et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of 23 Pro-Life Organizations and the Judicial Education Project filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Education Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of Bipartisan State and Local Legislators filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amici curiae of Health Care Providers, et al. filed.|
|Sep 11 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
|Sep 25 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. of Maryland. The record is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 3 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Also received from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is 1 Box, the records are SEALED.|
|Oct 24 2014||Brief of respondent United Parcel Service, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 31 2014||Brief amici curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council, et al. filed.|
|Oct 31 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 31 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 31 2014||Brief amicus curiae of U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed.|
|Nov 3 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 7 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Nov 20 2014||Reply of petitioner Peggy Young filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 3 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Samuel R. Bagenstos, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Caitlin J. Halligan, New York, N. Y.|
|Mar 25 2015||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy and Thomas, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Mar 25 2015||Record from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit has been returned.|
|Apr 27 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.