|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-632||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether an alien satisfies her burden of proof to establish that she meets the applicable eligibility requirements for discretionary cancellation of removal when the record establishes that she has been convicted under a statute defining multiple crimes, at least some of which would constitute disqualifying offenses, but it is inconclusive as to which crime formed the basis of the alien’s conviction.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 04 2019||Application (19A383) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2019 to November 15, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Oct 07 2019||Application (19A383) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 15, 2019.|
|Nov 15 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)|
|Nov 15 2019||Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.|
|Dec 13 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2019 to December 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 23, 2019.|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief of respondent Aracely Marinelarena in opposition filed.|
|Jan 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.|
|Mar 04 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.|
|Mar 08 2021||Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Pereida v. Wilkinson, 592 U. S. ___ (2021).|
|Apr 09 2021||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.