Breaking News
Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):

Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1573 Cal. Ct. App. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2021

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on a cert-stage amicus brief in support of petitioner in this case.

Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot raise representative claims, including under the California Private Attorneys General Act.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
May 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2021)
May 25 2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Viking River Cruises, Inc.
Jun 11 2021Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
Jun 14 2021Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
Jun 14 2021Brief amicus curiae of California New Car Dealers Association filed.
Jun 14 2021Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
Jun 14 2021Brief amicus curiae of Restaurant Law Center filed.
Jun 30 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
Jul 13 2021Response Requested. (Due August 12, 2021)
Aug 04 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 12, 2021 to September 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Aug 05 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 10, 2021.
Sep 10 2021Brief of respondent Angie Moriana in opposition filed.
Sep 28 2021Reply of petitioner Viking River Cruises, Inc. filed.
Nov 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
Dec 15 2021Petition GRANTED.
Jan 04 2022Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Viking River Cruises, Inc.
Jan 13 2022Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Angie Moriana