|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-387||Wash.||Mar 21, 2018||May 21, 2018||7-2||Gorsuch||OT 2017|
Holding: County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation, 502 U. S. 251, addressed only a question of statutory interpretation of the Indian General Allotment Act of 1887, not the question whether Indian tribes have sovereign immunity in in rem lawsuits. The Lundgrens now ask the Supreme Court to affirm on an alternative, common-law ground: that the tribe cannot assert sovereign immunity because this suit relates to immovable property located in Washington state, purchased by the tribe in the same manner as a private individual. Because this alternative argument did not emerge until late in this case, the Washington Supreme Court should address it in the first instance.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on May 21, 2018. Chief Justice Roberts filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kennedy joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 11 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2017)|
|Oct 13 2017||Brief of respondents Sharline Lundgren and Ray Lundgren in opposition filed.|
|Oct 27 2017||Reply of petitioner Upper Skagit Indian Tribe filed.|
|Nov 01 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2017.|
|Nov 17 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 27 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.|
|Dec 04 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.|
|Dec 08 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief of petitioner Upper Skagit Indian Tribe filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Jan 24 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 21, 2018|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, Seneca Nation of Indians, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, Cherokee Nation, Pueblo of Pojoaque filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, and Skokomish Indian Tribe filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of States of Illinois, Indiana, New Mexico, and Texas filed in Support of Neither Party|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians, et al. filed.|
|Feb 07 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 21 2018||Record requested from the Supreme Court of Washington.|
|Feb 21 2018||Brief of respondents Sharline Lundgren and Ray Lundgren filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Public Service Company of New Mexico filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of Village of Union Springs, Town of Springport, Cayuga County filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Seneca County, New York filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 12 2018||Reply of petitioner Upper Skagit Indian Tribe filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 16 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Mar 21 2018||Argued. For petitioner: David S. Hawkins, Sedro-Woolley, Wash.; and Ann O’Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Eric D. Miller, Seattle, Wash.|
|May 21 2018||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Roberts, C. J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kennedy, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined.|
|Jun 22 2018||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|Jun 22 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...