|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-766||8th Cir.||Oct 9, 2018||Dec 10, 2018||9-0||Breyer||OT 2018|
Holding: The term “burglary” in the Armed Career Criminal Act includes burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on December 10, 2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 20 2017||Application (17A447) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 1, 2017.|
|Oct 20 2017||Application (17A447) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 1, 2017 to December 1, 2017, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.|
|Nov 21 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2017)|
|Dec 18 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2017 to January 25, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 22 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 25, 2018.|
|Jan 19 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 25, 2018 to February 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 25 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 26, 2018.|
|Feb 23 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jason Sims.|
|Feb 23 2018||Brief of respondent Jason Sims in opposition filed.|
|Mar 07 2018||Reply of petitioner United States filed.|
|Mar 21 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.|
|Apr 16 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018.|
|Apr 23 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Apr 23 2018||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 17-765 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.|
|Apr 23 2018||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 17-765. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 17-765. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the flings is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Jul 09 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Tuesday, October 9, 2018. VIDED.|
|Aug 03 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 07 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.|
|Aug 14 2018||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. 1 Envelope.|
|Sep 26 2018||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Eastern Dist. of Arkansas is electronic and located on PACER with the exception of SEALED documents that are electronic.|
|Oct 09 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Erica Ross, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jeffrey L. Fisher, Menlo Park, Cal. (Appointed by this Court.) VIDED.|
|Dec 10 2018||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jan 11 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.