Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17-312 | 9th Cir. | Mar 26, 2018 | May 14, 2018 | 9-0 | Roberts | OT 2017 |
Holding: The defendants’ appeals challenging the use of full restraints during nonjury pretrial proceedings became moot when their underlying criminal cases came to an end before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit could render its decision.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on May 14, 2018.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Aug 29 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2017) |
Sep 19 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 13, 2017, for all respondents. |
Sep 28 2017 | Brief amici curiae of Senator Jeff Flake, et al. filed. |
Sep 28 2017 | Brief amicus curiae of California State Sheriffs' Association filed. |
Nov 13 2017 | Brief of respondents Moises Patricio-Guzman, et al. in opposition filed. |
Nov 13 2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Moises Patricio-Guzman |
Nov 13 2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez |
Nov 13 2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jasmin Isabel Morales |
Nov 13 2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Mark William Ring |
Nov 20 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017. |
Nov 21 2017 | Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed) |
Dec 08 2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondents GRANTED. |
Dec 08 2017 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. |
Jan 22 2018 | Brief of petitioner United States filed. |
Jan 22 2018 | Joint appendix filed. |
Jan 24 2018 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 26, 2018 |
Feb 07 2018 | CIRCULATED |
Feb 21 2018 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. |
Feb 21 2018 | Brief of respondents Moises Patricio-Guzman, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 28 2018 | Brief amici curiae of Former Judges, Former Prosecutors, Former Government Officials, Law Professors, and Social Scientists filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 28 2018 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed) |
Mar 14 2018 | Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed) |
Mar 23 2018 | Motion for appointment of counsel filed by respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez. |
Mar 26 2018 | Argued. For petitioner: Allon Kedem, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Reuben C. Cahn, San Diego, Cal. |
Apr 11 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018. |
Apr 30 2018 | Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Ellis M. Johnston, III, Esquire, of San Diego, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez in this case. |
May 14 2018 | Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. |
Jun 15 2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
www.scotusblog.com
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.