|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-1192||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2016|
Issue: (1) Whether, in determining the “parcel whole” for purposes of regulatory-takings analysis under the Just Compensation Clause, the court of appeals erred by severing regulated wetlands from unregulated, contiguous uplands under common ownership solely because respondent had no expectation of developing those wetlands at the time it developed the rest of the residential community; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the absence of reasonable, investment-backed expectations could not be considered in determining whether the denial of the permit resulted in a categorical regulatory taking of the residual wetlands tract under Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 15 2016||Application (15A746) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 28, 2016 to February 29, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jan 19 2016||Application (15A746) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 29, 2016.|
|Feb 16 2016||Application (15A746) to extend further the time from February 29, 2016 to March 28, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Feb 17 2016||Application (15A746) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 28, 2016.|
|Mar 22 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2016)|
|Apr 19 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 3, 2016.|
|May 3 2016||Brief of respondent Lost Tree Village Corporation in opposition filed.|
|May 17 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 2, 2016.|
|May 17 2016||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 26 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2017.|
|Jun 27 2017||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.