|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-418||5th Cir.||Apr 17, 2013||Jun 24, 2013||7-2||Breyer||OT 2012|
Holding: As applied to respondent Anthony Kebodeaux, the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act fall within the scope of Congress’s authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Judgment: Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on June 24, 2013. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Scalia joined as to parts I, II, and III-B.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 4 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2012)|
|Oct 16 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 5, 2012.|
|Dec 5 2012||Brief of respondent Anthony James Kebodeaux in opposition filed.|
|Dec 5 2012||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Anthony James Kebodeaux.|
|Dec 19 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 11, 2013.|
|Dec 21 2012||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 11 2013||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jan 11 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 17, 2013|
|Feb 25 2013||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Feb 25 2013||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Feb 28 2013||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas, El Paso Division. (1 Box)|
|Mar 4 2013||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Mar 8 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 15 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 5th Circuit is electronic.|
|Mar 27 2013||Brief of respondent Anthony James Kebodeaux filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 3 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 10 2013||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 17 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: M. Carolyn Fuentes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Antonio, Tex.|
|Jun 24 2013||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Roberts, C. J., and Alito, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Scalia, J., joined as to Parts I, II, and III-B.|
|Jul 26 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jul 29 2013||Record returned to U.S.D.C. for Western District of Texas, Ep Laso Division.|
We are honored to be chosen as the winner of an American Journalism Online Award for Best Non-profit News Source. Thanks to everyone for reading & supporting SCOTUSblog, including on our opinion-day live blogs, which the awarding judge called a "digital townsquare." #AJOawards
The winner of the award for Best Non-Profit News Source is @scotusblog. Judge @juliachanb called the site “a crucial tool in a political journalist’s toolbox” and praised their recent site revamp and dedication to transparency. https://www.scotusblog.com 2/
Quick Tok explainer on yesterday’s voting rights case at the Supreme Court—Merrill v. Milligan.
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...