|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-184||C.A.A.F.||Oct 13, 2020||Dec 10, 2020||8-0||Alito||OT 2020|
Holding: The prosecutions of three military service members for rape were timely under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on December 10, 2020. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 31 2019||Application (18A1257) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 10, 2019 to July 10, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jun 06 2019||Application (18A1257) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 10, 2019.|
|Jun 28 2019||Application (18A1257) to extend further the time from July 10, 2019 to August 9, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 03 2019||Application (18A1257) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 9, 2019.|
|Aug 09 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 9, 2019)|
|Aug 30 2019||Motion respondent Humphrey Daniels to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2019 to October 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 9, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Sep 09 2019||Brief of respondent Richard D. Collins in opposition filed.|
|Sep 09 2019||Brief amici curiae of Harmony Allen and Tonja Schulz filed.|
|Oct 09 2019||Brief of respondent Humphrey Daniels in opposition filed.|
|Oct 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.|
|Oct 23 2019||Reply of petitioner USA filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 12 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.|
|Nov 15 2019||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-108 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.|
|Nov 15 2019||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-108. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-108. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Jan 31 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 23, 2020. VIDED|
|Feb 19 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Armed Forces.|
|Feb 19 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 26 2020||Record received from the U.S.C.A. for the Armed Forces. (1-Envelope)|
|Mar 16 2020||ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED. VIDED.|
|Apr 13 2020||Argument to be rescheduled for the October Term 2020. VIDED.|
|Jul 13 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 13, 2020. VIDED.|
|Oct 13 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Jeffrey B. Wall, Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. For respondents: Stephen I. Vladeck, Austin, Tex. VIDED.|
|Dec 10 2020||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Barrett, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the cases. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion. VIDED.|
|Jan 11 2021||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...