|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-1038||9th Cir.||Dec 4, 2013||Feb 26, 2014||9-0||Roberts||OT 2013|
Holding: For purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1382, which makes it a crime to re-enter a “military installation” after having been ordered not to do so, a portion of an Air Force base that contains a designated protest area and an easement for a public road qualifies as a “military installation.”
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on February 26, 2014. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Alito also filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 13 2012||Application (12A610) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 26, 2012 to January 25, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Dec 19 2012||Application (12A610) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until January 25, 2013.|
|Jan 14 2013||Application (12A610) to extend further the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2013 to February 24, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jan 16 2013||Application (12A610) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until February 24, 2013.|
|Feb 22 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2013)|
|Mar 18 2013||Waiver of right of respondent John Dennis Apel to respond filed.|
|Mar 27 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 12, 2013.|
|Mar 29 2013||Response Requested . (Due April 29, 2013)|
|Apr 29 2013||Brief of respondent John Dennis Apel in opposition filed.|
|May 9 2013||Reply of petitioner United States filed.|
|May 14 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 30, 2013.|
|Jun 3 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 3 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 25, 2013.|
|Jul 3 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 9, 2013.|
|Jul 16 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jul 22 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including August 16, 2013.|
|Jul 22 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is further extended to and including October 21, 2013.|
|Jul 23 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Aug 16 2013||Joint appendix filed.|
|Aug 16 2013||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Sep 17 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday December 4, 2013|
|Sep 17 2013||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 18 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Sep 18 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Central District of California is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 21 2013||Brief of respondent John Dennis Apel filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2013||Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Nuclear Age Peace Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 28 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 20 2013||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 4 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Benjamin J. Horwich, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Erwin Chemerinsky, Irvine, Cal.|
|Feb 26 2014||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Mar 31 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
We’ve gotten roughly half of the merits opinions for the term so far. Kavanaugh is trending as the median justice and appears to be supplanting Roberts.
Of course, that could all change by June. Here’s the first in a series on interim stats from the term.
On a new, conservative court, Kavanaugh sits at the center - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first in a series on interim statistics from the 2020-21 Supreme Court term. The Supreme Cou...
The Supreme Court will release orders and opinion(s?) on Monday May 17.
Order list at 9:30 a.m. EDT. Opinions at 10:00.
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.