Unicolors, Inc v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-915 | 9th Cir. | Nov 8, 2021 | Feb 24, 2022 | 6-3 | Breyer | OT 2021 |
Holding: Lack of either factual or legal knowledge can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration under 17 U.S.C. § 411(b)(1)(A)"s safe harbor.
Judgment: Vacated and Remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on February 24, 2022. Justice Thomas filed a dissent, in which Justice Alito joined, and Justice Gorsuch joined as to all but Part II.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices require actual knowledge that application was erroneous to invalidate copyright filing (Ronald Mann, February 25, 2022)
- Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 24 (complete) (Angie Gou, February 24, 2022)
- Justices debate consequences of failure to comply with Copyright Office formalities (Ronald Mann, November 9, 2021)
- Justices to examine importance of compliance with Copyright Office formalities (Ronald Mann, November 8, 2021)
- New York Second Amendment case headlines November argument calendar (Amy Howe, August 16, 2021)
- Justices to tackle copyright dispute next term (Amy Howe, June 1, 2021)
- Habeas restrictions, copyright and the potential return of the community caretaking exception (John Elwood, May 28, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
01/04/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021) |
01/19/2021 | Waiver of right of respondent H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. to respond filed. |
01/27/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021. |
02/09/2021 | Response Requested. (Due March 11, 2021) |
03/04/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 11, 2021 to April 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
03/05/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2021. |
03/11/2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers and California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. |
04/01/2021 | Brief of respondents H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. in opposition filed. |
04/12/2021 | Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 21, 2021 to May 4, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
04/13/2021 | Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 4, 2021 granted. |
05/03/2021 | Reply of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
05/04/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021. |
05/24/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021. |
06/01/2021 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. |
06/25/2021 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. |
07/12/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 3, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 21, 2021. |
07/13/2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Unicolors, Inc. |
07/19/2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. |
08/03/2021 | Brief of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. |
08/03/2021 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed) |
08/10/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Copyright Alliance filed. |
08/10/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed. |
08/10/2021 | Brief amici curiae of American Society of Media Photographers and California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. |
08/10/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed. |
08/10/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed. |
08/10/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. |
08/16/2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Monday, November 8, 2021. |
09/01/2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. |
09/21/2021 | CIRCULATED |
09/21/2021 | Brief of respondents H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
09/22/2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed. |
09/27/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed. (Distributed) |
09/28/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Copyright Law filed. (Distributed) |
09/28/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology and Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed) |
09/28/2021 | Brief amici curiae of Andrew D. Lockton and McHale & Slavin, P.A. filed. (Distributed) |
09/28/2021 | Brief amici curiae of California Fashion Association filed. (Distributed) |
09/28/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Victoria Burke filed. (Distributed) |
09/28/2021 | Amicus brief of National Retail Federation not accepted for filing. (Corrected version submitted) (October 04, 2021) |
09/28/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed. (Distributed) |
10/12/2021 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED. |
10/14/2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. |
10/14/2021 | Reply of petitioner Unicolors, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
10/18/2021 | The time for oral argument is allotted as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General, and 35 minutes for respondent. |
11/08/2021 | Argued. For petitioner: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Melissa N. Patterson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Peter K. Stris, Los Angeles, Cal. |
02/24/2022 | Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined, and in which Gorsuch, J., joined, except as to Part II. |
03/28/2022 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |