Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corporation, dba Empire State Development Corporation

Petition for certiorari denied on December 13, 2010
Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-402 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2010

Issue: 1) Whether it was error for the Court of Appeals of New York to disregard the principles enunciated in Kelo v. City of New London in sanctioning the use of eminent domain for the benefit of a private developer? 2) Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States imposes any minimum procedural standards, in accordance with the requirement of fundamental fairness, to preserve a property owner's meaningful opportunity to be heard within the context of an eminent domain taking?

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards