|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-122||9th Cir.||Not Argued||Nov 25, 2019||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2019|
Holding: The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to revisit whether Alaska’s political contribution limits are consistent with this Court’s First Amendment precedents.
Judgment: Granted, vacated, and remanded in a per curiam opinion on November 25, 2019. Justice Ginsburg filed a statement.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 02 2019||Application (18A1132) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 21, 2019 to June 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|May 03 2019||Application (18A1132) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 20, 2019.|
|Jun 05 2019||Application (18A1132) to extend further the time from June 20, 2019 to July 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jun 06 2019||Application (18A1132) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 20, 2019.|
|Jul 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)|
|Aug 13 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 26, 2019 to September 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 15 2019||Letter of August 8, 2019, regarding substitution of parties under Rule 35 received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Aug 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 25, 2019.|
|Aug 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of The National Republican Senatorial Committee, et al. filed.|
|Aug 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and the Institute for Justice filed.|
|Aug 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Free Speech filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief of respondents Heather Hebdon, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 09 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Oct 09 2019||Reply of petitioners David Thompson, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.|
|Nov 12 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.|
|Nov 25 2019||The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded for that court to revisit whether Alaska's contribution limits are consistent with our First Amendment precedents. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) Statement of Justice Ginsburg. (Detached Opinion)|
|Dec 27 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...