|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-122||9th Cir.||Not Argued||Nov 25, 2019||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2019|
Holding: The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to revisit whether Alaska’s political contribution limits are consistent with this Court’s First Amendment precedents.
Judgment: Granted, vacated, and remanded in a per curiam opinion on November 25, 2019. Justice Ginsburg filed a statement.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 02 2019||Application (18A1132) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 21, 2019 to June 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|May 03 2019||Application (18A1132) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 20, 2019.|
|Jun 05 2019||Application (18A1132) to extend further the time from June 20, 2019 to July 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jun 06 2019||Application (18A1132) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 20, 2019.|
|Jul 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)|
|Aug 13 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 26, 2019 to September 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 15 2019||Letter of August 8, 2019, regarding substitution of parties under Rule 35 received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Aug 16 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 25, 2019.|
|Aug 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of The National Republican Senatorial Committee, et al. filed.|
|Aug 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and the Institute for Justice filed.|
|Aug 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Free Speech filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief of respondents Heather Hebdon, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Oct 09 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Oct 09 2019||Reply of petitioners David Thompson, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.|
|Nov 12 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.|
|Nov 25 2019||The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded for that court to revisit whether Alaska's contribution limits are consistent with our First Amendment precedents. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) Statement of Justice Ginsburg. (Detached Opinion)|
|Dec 27 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...