Issue: Whether an intervenor’s interest in transparency is sufficient to confer Article III standing to seek access to sealed or protected judicial records; whether an intervenor’s standing turns on whether the underlying case is still pending; or whether an intervenor must show personalized “adverse effects” to seek document unsealing.
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.