|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1432||8th Cir.||Mar 19, 2018||Jun 11, 2018||8-1||Kagan||OT 2017|
Holding: The retroactive application of Minnesota’s revocation-on-divorce statute -- which automatically nullifies an ex-spouse’s beneficiary designation on a life-insurance policy or other will substitute -- does not violate the Constitution’s contracts clause.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 11, 2018. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 01 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2017)|
|Jun 05 2017||Waiver of right of respondent Kaye Melin to respond filed.|
|Jul 19 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017.|
|Aug 01 2017||Response Requested. (Due August 31, 2017)|
|Aug 16 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 29, 2017.|
|Sep 29 2017||Brief of respondent Kaye Melin in opposition filed.|
|Oct 06 2017||Reply of petitioners Ashley Sveen, et al. filed.|
|Oct 18 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2017.|
|Oct 23 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 20 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.|
|Dec 08 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Dec 18 2017||Letter from counsel for petitioners regarding case caption filed.|
|Jan 16 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners Ashley Sveen, et al.|
|Jan 22 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief of petitioners Ashley Sveen, et al. filed.|
|Jan 24 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 19, 2018|
|Jan 26 2018||Brief amicus curiae of American College of Trust and Estate Counsel filed.|
|Feb 07 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 21 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.|
|Feb 21 2018||Brief of respondent Kaye Melin filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Professor James W. Ely, Jr. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amici curiae of The Women’s Law Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 05 2018||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. (1 Box)|
|Mar 08 2018||Reply of petitioners Ashley Sveen, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 19 2018||Argued. For petitioners: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 11 2018||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Jul 13 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Aug 21 2018||The Record from the U.S.C.A. 8th C has been returned.|
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...