|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-540||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2017|
Issue: Whether a private party with Article III standing may be barred from asserting constitutional claims for money damages against the federal government because of the equitable doctrine of “third-party prudential standing.”
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 11 2017||Application (17A63) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 7, 2017 to September 6, 2017, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 21 2017||Application (17A63) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 6, 2017.|
|Aug 22 2017||Application (17A63) to extend further the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 6, 2017 to October 6, 2017, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Aug 25 2017||Application (17A63) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 6, 2017.|
|Oct 06 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2017)|
|Nov 09 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 13, 2017.|
|Nov 13 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Nov 21 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2017 to January 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 22 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 12, 2018|
|Jan 04 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 12, 2018 to February 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 05 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 12, 2018.|
|Feb 12 2018||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Feb 27 2018||Reply of petitioner Starr International Company, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 28 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.|
|Mar 15 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.|
|Mar 26 2018||Petition DENIED.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.