|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-986||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: Whether the Federal Circuit en banc misconstrued 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)(1)(A) by holding a shareholder, officer, and employee of the corporate importer of record jointly and severally liable for gross negligence penalties under the court's theory that he “introduce[ed]” the goods, where the corporate importer of record had “entered” the goods with Customs, and where the government disavowed seeking liability against petitioner as either an aider or abettor under 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)(1)(B) or by piercing the veil of the corporate importer, and had never advanced the court's theory.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 2 2014||Application (14A589) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 15, 2014 to February 13, 2015, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Dec 4 2014||Application (14A589) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 13, 2015.|
|Feb 13 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 16, 2015)|
|Feb 26 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Mar 11 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 15, 2015.|
|Mar 16 2015||Brief amicus curiae of The American Association of Exporters and Importers filed.|
|Apr 15 2015||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Apr 27 2015||Reply of petitioner Harish Shadadpuri filed.|
|May 5 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 21, 2015.|
|May 26 2015||Petition DENIED.|
If you’re looking for an explainer of the 15 cases outstanding this term, look no further! Newly updated
via @AHoweBlogger 👇
There's an updated version -- now only 15 opinions to go! https://amylhowe.com/2021/06/18/reading-the-tea-leaves-remaining-cases-as-of-june-18/ https://twitter.com/aander1987/status/1406404952113790977
A surprising stat at this point in the term: Both Kagan and Breyer have been in the majority slightly more often than Alito.
Kavanaugh continues to have the highest rate (as he has for most of the term). Sotomayor has the lowest.
Still 15 cases left. So this could all change.
The first two pieces in our symposium on yesterday's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia are up. First, @JimOleske dissects the decision in light of the court's shadow-docket ruling in Tandon v. Newsom, which took a very different approach to free exercise.
Fulton quiets Tandon’s thunder: A free exercise puzzle - SCOTUSblog
This article is the first entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. ...
Number of pages written by each justice in the five decisions handed down this week (majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents all included):
While today's decision in Fulton v. Philadelphia is a win for a Catholic group seeking to participate in the city's foster program, it stops short of the broad endorsement of religious freedom the challengers had hoped for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis:
Court holds that city’s refusal to make referrals to faith-based agency violates Constitution - SCOTUSblog
In a clash between religious freedom and public policies that protect LGBTQ people, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday...
Now do we say that Sonia Sotomayor and the other liberals supported child slavery by all voting for Nestle today? Of course not. And Nestle’s lawyers like @Neal_katyal obviously don’t either. The cheap attacks on the court and thoughtful lawyers did not age well. -tg
The claim @nealkatyal was defending slavery is flat wrong & libelous. Here is what he actually said, which is the reverse: child slavery is abhorrent, criminal, horrific. Remember in a pending case he can't comment, so read what he really said in full.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.