Breaking News

SD-3C, LLC v. Oliver

Petition for certiorari denied on April 6, 2015

Linked with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-641 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2014

Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it held that petitioners are subject to antitrust suits seeking injunctive relief against the foundational terms of a decade-old standard setting and technology licensing arrangement for as long as third parties continue to make sales of goods embodying that technology; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it treated its statute of limitations analysis as dispositive on the issue of laches, without considering the broader equitable issues associated with permitting challenges to long-settled business arrangements.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Dec 1 2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 5, 2015)
Jan 5 2015Brief amicus curiae of Economist Dr. Barry C. Harris filed.
Jan 21 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015.
Jan 28 2015Response Requested . (Due February 27, 2015)
Feb 27 2015Brief of respondents Dan Oliver, et al. in opposition filed.
Mar 17 2015Reply of petitioners SD-3C, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 18 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 3, 2015.
Apr 6 2015Petition DENIED.