|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-59||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it held - in conflict with the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits, but in accord with the Seventh Circuit - that a district court's order striking or refusing to consider a qualified immunity motion is not subject to interlocutory appeal, even when it subjects a public official to unlimited discovery for the duration of a lawsuit; and (2) whether petitioners are entitled to qualified immunity.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 16 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 18, 2014)|
|Jul 21 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Aug 1 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents|
|Aug 11 2014||Waiver of right of respondents Gage Wescom, et al. to respond filed.|
|Aug 18 2014||Brief amici curiae of The International Municipal Lawyers Association, and The National Association of Police Organizations filed.|
|Aug 27 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|
|Sep 3 2014||Response Requested . (Due October 3, 2014)|
|Sep 30 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 3, 2014.|
|Nov 3 2014||Brief of respondents Gage Wescom, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 18 2014||Reply of petitioners John Darren Schultz, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 19 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2014.|
|Dec 8 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2014.|
|Dec 15 2014||Petition DENIED.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.