|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Jan 17, 2023
Issue: Whether the court of appeals correctly determined that 8 U.S.C. 1252(d)(1) prevented the court from reviewing petitioner's claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals engaged in impermissible factfinding because petitioner had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 30 2022||Application (21A565) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 20, 2022 to May 20, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Mar 30 2022||Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.|
|Apr 03 2022||Application (21A565) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until May 10, 2022.|
|May 10 2022||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 13, 2022)|
|Jun 07 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 13, 2022 to July 13, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 09 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 13, 2022.|
|Jul 11 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 13, 2022 to August 12, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 12 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 12, 2022.|
|Aug 12 2022||Brief of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General in opposition filed.|
|Aug 30 2022||Reply of petitioner Leon Santos-Zacaria filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 31 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.|
|Oct 03 2022||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 03 2022||As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.|
|Nov 10 2022||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, January 17, 2023.|
|Nov 16 2022||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Nov 17 2022||Brief of petitioner Leon Santos-Zacaria filed.|
|Nov 17 2022||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 23 2022||Amicus brief of Constitutional Accountability Center & National Immigration Litigation Alliance submitted.|
|Nov 23 2022||Amicus brief of Legal Services Providers submitted.|
|Nov 23 2022||Amicus brief of Former Immigration Judges and Former Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals submitted.|
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf
JUST IN: The Biden administration, as expected, asks the Supreme Court to revive Biden's student-loan relief plan. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit blocked the government from implementing the plan; Biden wants SCOTUS to lift that ruling. https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/22A444-2.pdf
JUST IN: The Supreme Court DENIES Arizona GOP chair Kelli Ward's bid to block the Jan. 6 committee from reviewing her phone records. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissent from the court's brief, unexplained order denying Ward's request.
NEW: Another fight on the shadow docket over a subpoena seeking information about election interference. Arizona GOP chairwoman Kelli Ward is asking SCOTUS to block the Jan. 6 committee's subpoena for her phone records. Here's Ward's filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A350.pdf