|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|10-930||9th Cir.||Oct 9, 2012||Jan 8, 2013||9-0||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: 18 U.S.C. § 3599 does not provide a state prisoner with the right to suspend his federal habeas proceedings when he is adjudged incompetent.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on January 8, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 18 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2011)|
|Feb 10 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 25, 2011.|
|Feb 21 2011||Brief amici curiae of Utah, et al. filed.|
|Apr 25 2011||Brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales in opposition filed.|
|May 9 2011||Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|May 10 2011||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2011.|
|May 31 2011||The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Feb 9 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Feb 20 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 22 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 16, 2012.|
|Mar 14 2012||Supplemental brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 19 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Apr 20 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 25, 2012.|
|Apr 20 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2012.|
|May 25 2012||Brief of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed.|
|May 25 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.|
|May 31 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Arizona Voice for Crime Victims filed.|
|Jun 1 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed (also in 11-218)|
|Jun 1 2012||Brief amici curiae of Utah, et al. filed (also in 11-218).|
|Jun 11 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Jul 20 2012||Brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 9, 2012|
|Jul 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 25 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jul 26 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 box)|
|Jul 27 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. (also in 11-218)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Psychiatric Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. VIDED.|
|Aug 2 2012||Record received from U.S.D.C. for District of Arizona. (3 boxes)|
|Aug 13 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Aug 20 2012||Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 9 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, Phoenix, Ariz. For United States, as amicus curiae supporting petitioners in Nos. 11-218 & 10-930: Ann O'Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Leticia Marquez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Tucson, Ariz.|
|Jan 8 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. (Decided together with No. 11-218)|
|Feb 11 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf