|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|10-930||9th Cir.||Oct 9, 2012||Jan 8, 2013||9-0||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: 18 U.S.C. § 3599 does not provide a state prisoner with the right to suspend his federal habeas proceedings when he is adjudged incompetent.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on January 8, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 18 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2011)|
|Feb 10 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 25, 2011.|
|Feb 21 2011||Brief amici curiae of Utah, et al. filed.|
|Apr 25 2011||Brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales in opposition filed.|
|May 9 2011||Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|May 10 2011||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2011.|
|May 31 2011||The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Feb 9 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Feb 20 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 22 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 16, 2012.|
|Mar 14 2012||Supplemental brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 19 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Apr 20 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 25, 2012.|
|Apr 20 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2012.|
|May 25 2012||Brief of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed.|
|May 25 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.|
|May 31 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Arizona Voice for Crime Victims filed.|
|Jun 1 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed (also in 11-218)|
|Jun 1 2012||Brief amici curiae of Utah, et al. filed (also in 11-218).|
|Jun 11 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Jul 20 2012||Brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 9, 2012|
|Jul 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 25 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jul 26 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 box)|
|Jul 27 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. (also in 11-218)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Psychiatric Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. VIDED.|
|Aug 2 2012||Record received from U.S.D.C. for District of Arizona. (3 boxes)|
|Aug 13 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Aug 20 2012||Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 9 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, Phoenix, Ariz. For United States, as amicus curiae supporting petitioners in Nos. 11-218 & 10-930: Ann O'Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Leticia Marquez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Tucson, Ariz.|
|Jan 8 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. (Decided together with No. 11-218)|
|Feb 11 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...
Tonight's ruling on the Trump Jan. 6 documents, explained.
BREAKING: Trump loses his bid at SCOTUS to block Congress from obtaining his White House records related to 1/6/21. Clarence Thomas is the lone public dissenter in the apparent 8-1 ruling.
#SCOTUS rejects request from former President Donald Trump to block the release of documents to committee investigating Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a272_9p6b.pdf