|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|10-930||9th Cir.||Oct 9, 2012||Jan 8, 2013||9-0||Thomas||OT 2012|
Holding: 18 U.S.C. § 3599 does not provide a state prisoner with the right to suspend his federal habeas proceedings when he is adjudged incompetent.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on January 8, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 18 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 22, 2011)|
|Feb 10 2011||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 25, 2011.|
|Feb 21 2011||Brief amici curiae of Utah, et al. filed.|
|Apr 25 2011||Brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales in opposition filed.|
|May 9 2011||Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|May 10 2011||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2011.|
|May 31 2011||The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Feb 9 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Feb 20 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 22 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 16, 2012.|
|Mar 14 2012||Supplemental brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 19 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Apr 20 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 25, 2012.|
|Apr 20 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2012.|
|May 25 2012||Brief of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed.|
|May 25 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.|
|May 31 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Arizona Voice for Crime Victims filed.|
|Jun 1 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed (also in 11-218)|
|Jun 1 2012||Brief amici curiae of Utah, et al. filed (also in 11-218).|
|Jun 11 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Jul 20 2012||Brief of respondent Ernest Valencia Gonzales filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 9, 2012|
|Jul 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 25 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jul 26 2012||Record received from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 box)|
|Jul 27 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. (also in 11-218)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Psychiatric Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 27 2012||Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. VIDED.|
|Aug 2 2012||Record received from U.S.D.C. for District of Arizona. (3 boxes)|
|Aug 13 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Aug 20 2012||Reply of petitioner Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 9 2012||Argued. For petitioner: Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General, Phoenix, Ariz. For United States, as amicus curiae supporting petitioners in Nos. 11-218 & 10-930: Ann O'Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Leticia Marquez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Tucson, Ariz.|
|Jan 8 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. (Decided together with No. 11-218)|
|Feb 11 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.