|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1625||9th Cir.||Jan 14, 2019||Mar 4, 2019||9-0||Kavanaugh||OT 2018|
Holding: A federal district court’s discretion to award “full costs” to a party in copyright litigation pursuant to 17 U. S. C. §505 is limited to the six categories specified in the general costs statute codified at 28 U. S. C. §§1821 and 1920.
Judgment: Reversed in part and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on March 4, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 31 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 2, 2018)|
|Jun 28 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 2, 2018 to August 1, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 28 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 1, 2018.|
|Aug 01 2018||Brief of respondents Oracle USA Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 14 2018||Reply of petitioners Rimini Street, Inc., and Seth Ravin filed.|
|Aug 15 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Sep 27 2018||Petition GRANTED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
|Oct 24 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Rimini Street, Inc., and Seth Ravin.|
|Oct 26 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Oracle USA Inc., et al.|
|Nov 13 2018||Brief of petitioners Rimini Street, Inc., and Seth Ravin filed.|
|Nov 13 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 19 2018||Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Corpus Linguistics filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Patrick T. Gillen filed.|
|Nov 28 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, January 14, 2019|
|Nov 30 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 06 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 11 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Dec 12 2018||Record received from both the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit and the U.S.D.C. District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of some SEALED and Restricted documents that are electronic.|
|Dec 13 2018||Brief of respondents Oracle USA Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Ralph Oman filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Linguistics filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Music Publishers' Association, and Recording Industry Association of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of BSA | The Software Alliance. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Copyright Alliance filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Steven Baicker-Mckee filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 03 2019||Justice Alito is no longer recused in this case.|
|Jan 04 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 04 2019||Reply of petitioners Rimini Street, Inc., and Seth Ravin filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 14 2019||Argued. For petitioners: Mark A. Perry, Washington, D. C.; and Allon Kedem, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.|
|Mar 04 2019||Adjudged to be REVERSED IN PART and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 05 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.