|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-992||1st Cir.||Dec 9, 2013||Jan 15, 2014||9-0||Kennedy||OT 2013|
Holding: A decision on the merits is a "final decision" even if the award or amount of attorney's fees remains to be determined.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on January 15, 2014.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 30 2012||Application (12A551) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 11, 2012 to February 8, 2013, submitted to Justice Breyer.|
|Dec 3 2012||Application (12A551) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until February 8, 2013.|
|Feb 8 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 14, 2013)|
|Feb 21 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 13, 2013.|
|May 13 2013||Brief of respondents Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 24 2013||Reply of petitioner Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed.|
|May 28 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.|
|Jun 17 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 11 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2013.|
|Jul 11 2013||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 23, 2013.|
|Aug 27 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 27 2013||Brief of petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed.|
|Sep 17 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday December 9, 2013|
|Sep 17 2013||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 2 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 1st Circuit is electronic and is available on PACER.|
|Oct 3 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for District of Massachusetts is electronic and is availabe on PACER.|
|Oct 23 2013||Brief of respondents Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Reply of petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 9 2013||Argued. For petitioners: Dan Himmelfarb, Washington, D. C. For respondents: James A. Feldman, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 15 2014||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 18 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
A majority of the Supreme Court seems inclined to uphold Mississippi's 15-week abortion law, but the six conservative justices appear divided about whether to entirely overrule Roe v. Wade. @AHoweBlogger's first take from this morning's argument:
Majority of court appears poised to uphold Mississippi’s ban on most abortions after 15 weeks - SCOTUSblog
It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirme...
Starting momentarily: Oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case involving Mississippi’s attempt to ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks. The state has asked the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. We’ll be live-tweeting the argument here in this thread.
Twenty minutes before the start of oral argument, here’s the scene outside the Supreme Court.
Photos by @katieleebarlow.
TODAY AT SCOTUS: The case that could determine the future of abortion in America. Oral argument begins at 10 a.m. EST. We'll be live-tweeting the full argument. You can also listen live here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx.
Here's our preview from @AHoweBlogger: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/11/roe-v-wade-hangs-in-balance-as-reshaped-court-prepares-to-hear-biggest-abortion-case-in-decades/
Our cross-platform coverage of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization includes, of course, TikTok. Follow us there if you don't already! And tune in for @katieleebarlow's live dispatch from outside the court tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. EST.
SCOTUS was inundated with "friend of the court" briefs -- more than 140 of them -- in the abortion case being heard tomorrow. We reviewed them all. Here's a guide to the many arguments being pushed by academics, politicians, & interest groups in the case.
We read all the amicus briefs in Dobbs so you don’t have to - SCOTUSblog
More than 140 amicus briefs were filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the potentially momentou...