Ramirez-Hidalgo v. United States
Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya on June 25, 2018.
Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) violates the Constitution’s prohibition on vague criminal laws by requiring application of an indeterminate risk standard to the “ordinary case” of an individual’s prior conviction.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Feb 15 2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2018) |
| Mar 14 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 22, 2018 to April 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Mar 15 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 23, 2018. |
| Mar 23 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 23, 2018 to May 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Mar 26 2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 23, 2018. |
| May 23 2018 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| May 25 2018 | Reply of petitioner Jesus Ramirez-Hidalgo filed. (Distributed) |
| May 30 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018. |
| Jun 18 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018. |
| Jun 25 2018 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U. S. ____ (2018). |
| Jul 27 2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
