| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-1541 | Cal. Super. Ct. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2021 |
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s discovery-stay provision applies to a private action under the Securities Act of 1933 in state or federal court, or solely to a private action in federal court.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| May 03 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2021) |
| May 03 2021 | Application (20A164) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
| May 06 2021 | Response to application (20A164) requested by Justice Kagan, due Wednesday, May 12, by 4 p.m. ET. |
| May 07 2021 | Waiver of right of respondents Zhung Tran, et al. to respond filed. |
| May 07 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America; and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. (Distributed) |
| May 11 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021. |
| May 11 2021 | Response Requested. (Due June 4, 2021) |
| May 12 2021 | Response to application from respondents Zhung Tran, et al. filed. |
| May 13 2021 | Letter of applicants received. |
| May 13 2021 | Application (20A164) withdrawn. |
| Jun 02 2021 | Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed. |
| Jun 04 2021 | Brief of respondents Zhung Tran, et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed) |
| Jun 07 2021 | Reply of petitioner Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Jun 08 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021. |
| Jul 01 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021. |
| Jul 02 2021 | Petition GRANTED. |
| Jul 15 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. |
| Aug 16 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, November 9, 2021. |
| Aug 16 2021 | Brief of petitioners Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. filed. |
| Aug 18 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Zhung Tran, et al. |
| Aug 23 2021 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED. |
| Aug 23 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. |
| Aug 23 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. |
| Aug 23 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Society for Corporate Governance filed. |
| Aug 23 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. |
| Aug 27 2021 | Joint motion to hold further briefing in abeyance and remove the case from the November 2021 argument calendar filed. |
| Sep 01 2021 | Record requested from the Court of Appeals of California First Appellate District.. |
| Sep 02 2021 | The case is removed from the argument calendar for Tuesday, November 9, 2021, and the briefing schedule is held in abeyance. The parties are directed to provide further updates to the Court concerning settlement proceedings. |
| Sep 02 2021 | REMOVED from the November 2021 ARGUMENT CALENDAR. |
| Oct 15 2021 | Letter from the parties updating Clerk on settlement proceedings filed. |
| Oct 20 2021 | Record received from Court of Appeals of California First Appellate District and also filings from California Supreme Court. The record has been electronically filed. |
JUST IN: One new cert grant in the court's Monday morning order list. The justices will hear Morgan v. Sundance, a lawsuit brought by a former Taco Bell worker. It involves how courts should decide when a defendant waived an arbitration clause. More here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/morgan-v-sundance-inc/
#SCOTUS order list is up, includes one new grant: arbitration case Morgan v. Sundance. The full order list is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/111521zor_h315.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: Billboards and the First Amendment. Specifically, did Austin, Texas, violate the free-speech rights of advertising companies when it regulated "off-premises" business signs more strictly than "on-premises" signs? @AHoweBlogger explains:

In First Amendment challenge to city billboard rules, justices will be sign language interpreters - SCOTUSblog
In 2015, the Supreme Court unanimously agreed that an Arizona town could not impose different restrictions on the ...
www.scotusblog.com
Today at SCOTUS: Oral arguments in two important cases starting at 10 a.m. EST. One case challenges Congress' exclusion of Puerto Rico from a federal safety-net program. The other involves the right of death-row prisoners to receive spiritual guidance in their final moments.
After adding 4 new cases to its docket on Friday, #SCOTUS issues orders today, but no additional grants. Here's the order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110821zor_apl1.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The court will release orders on pending petitions at 9:30 a.m. EST, & then the justices return to the bench at 10 for another week of oral arguments. Two cases today: a lawsuit against the FBI for surveilling Muslim Americans, and a technical copyright dispute.