|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-1541||Cal. Super. Ct.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2021|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s discovery-stay provision applies to a private action under the Securities Act of 1933 in state or federal court, or solely to a private action in federal court.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 03 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2021)|
|May 03 2021||Application (20A164) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|May 06 2021||Response to application (20A164) requested by Justice Kagan, due Wednesday, May 12, by 4 p.m. ET.|
|May 07 2021||Waiver of right of respondents Zhung Tran, et al. to respond filed.|
|May 07 2021||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America; and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. (Distributed)|
|May 11 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.|
|May 11 2021||Response Requested. (Due June 4, 2021)|
|May 12 2021||Response to application from respondents Zhung Tran, et al. filed.|
|May 13 2021||Letter of applicants received.|
|May 13 2021||Application (20A164) withdrawn.|
|Jun 02 2021||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Jun 04 2021||Brief of respondents Zhung Tran, et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 07 2021||Reply of petitioner Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 08 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
|Jul 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.|
|Jul 02 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 15 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners Pivotal Software, Inc., et al.|
|Aug 16 2021||ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, November 9, 2021.|
|Aug 16 2021||Brief of petitioners Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Aug 18 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Zhung Tran, et al.|
|Aug 23 2021||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.|
|Aug 23 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Aug 23 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Aug 23 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Society for Corporate Governance filed.|
|Aug 23 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Aug 27 2021||Joint motion to hold further briefing in abeyance and remove the case from the November 2021 argument calendar filed.|
|Sep 01 2021||Record requested from the Court of Appeals of California First Appellate District..|
|Sep 02 2021||The case is removed from the argument calendar for Tuesday, November 9, 2021, and the briefing schedule is held in abeyance. The parties are directed to provide further updates to the Court concerning settlement proceedings.|
|Sep 02 2021||REMOVED from the November 2021 ARGUMENT CALENDAR.|
|Oct 15 2021||Letter from the parties updating Clerk on settlement proceedings filed.|
|Oct 20 2021||Record received from Court of Appeals of California First Appellate District and also filings from California Supreme Court. The record has been electronically filed.|
|Nov 29 2021||Letter from the parties updating Clerk on settlement proceedings filed.|
|Jan 13 2022||Letter from the parties updating Clerk on settlement proceedings of Pivotal Software, Inc., et al. submitted.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.