|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-1315||9th Cir.||Jan 21, 2014||May 19, 2014||6-3||Ginsburg||OT 2013|
Holding: In a case by the owner of a screenplay alleging copyright infringement, the doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to the pursuit of a claim for damages brought within the three-year window established by Section 507(b) of the Copyright Act. However, in extraordinary circumstances, laches may, at the very outset of the litigation, curtail the relief equitably awarded.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on May 19, 2014. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 30 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2013)|
|May 16 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 2, 2013.|
|Jun 3 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Califorina Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.|
|Aug 2 2013||Brief of respondents Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 20 2013||Reply of petitioner Paula Petrella filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 21 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Oct 1 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 4 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Oct 9 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Nov 4 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 21, 2014.|
|Nov 15 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief of petitioner Paula Petrella filed.|
|Nov 19 2013||Record from the U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. There are SEALED documents in this record.|
|Nov 20 2013||Brief amici curiae of Southwestern Law Students Orly Ravid, and Andrew Pruitt, and Profesors Robert C. Lind and Michael M. Epstein filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Nov 21 2013||Brief amicus curiae of California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2013||Brief amici curiae of Professor Robin Feldman, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2013||Record received from the U.S.D.C. for the Central District of California (Western District - LA) is electronic and located on PACER. Also received are SEALED documents in this record, which consist of Volume 1 - Volume 6. (1 box)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Authors Guild, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Douglas Laycock, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Ralph Oman, Former Register of Copyrights of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Dec 6 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 16 2013||Brief of respondents Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Association for Competitive Technology filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of Dish Network L.L.C., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of T. Leigh Anenson filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of The Motion Picture Association of America, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 3 2014||Reply of petitioner Paula Petrella filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 10 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 21 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Stephanos Bibas, Philadelphia, Pa.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondents: Mark A. Perry, Washington, D. C.|
|May 19 2014||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, J., joined.|
|Jun 20 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jun 24 2014||Record for U.S.D.C. Central District of California (Western Division) has been returned.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...