|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-1315||9th Cir.||Jan 21, 2014||May 19, 2014||6-3||Ginsburg||OT 2013|
Holding: In a case by the owner of a screenplay alleging copyright infringement, the doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to the pursuit of a claim for damages brought within the three-year window established by Section 507(b) of the Copyright Act. However, in extraordinary circumstances, laches may, at the very outset of the litigation, curtail the relief equitably awarded.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on May 19, 2014. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 30 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2013)|
|May 16 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 2, 2013.|
|Jun 3 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Califorina Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed.|
|Aug 2 2013||Brief of respondents Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Aug 20 2013||Reply of petitioner Paula Petrella filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 21 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Oct 1 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 4 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Oct 9 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Nov 4 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 21, 2014.|
|Nov 15 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 15 2013||Brief of petitioner Paula Petrella filed.|
|Nov 19 2013||Record from the U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. There are SEALED documents in this record.|
|Nov 20 2013||Brief amici curiae of Southwestern Law Students Orly Ravid, and Andrew Pruitt, and Profesors Robert C. Lind and Michael M. Epstein filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Nov 21 2013||Brief amicus curiae of California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2013||Brief amici curiae of Professor Robin Feldman, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 21 2013||Record received from the U.S.D.C. for the Central District of California (Western District - LA) is electronic and located on PACER. Also received are SEALED documents in this record, which consist of Volume 1 - Volume 6. (1 box)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Authors Guild, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Douglas Laycock, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Ralph Oman, Former Register of Copyrights of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Dec 6 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 16 2013||Brief of respondents Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Association for Competitive Technology filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of Dish Network L.L.C., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amicus curiae of T. Leigh Anenson filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of The Motion Picture Association of America, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 3 2014||Reply of petitioner Paula Petrella filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 10 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 21 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Stephanos Bibas, Philadelphia, Pa.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondents: Mark A. Perry, Washington, D. C.|
|May 19 2014||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, J., joined.|
|Jun 20 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jun 24 2014||Record for U.S.D.C. Central District of California (Western Division) has been returned.|
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...