Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19-1212 | 9th Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2020 |
Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security policy known as the Migrant Protection Protocols is a lawful implementation of the statutory authority conferred by 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C); (2) whether MPP is consistent with any applicable and enforceable non-refoulement obligations; (3) whether MPP is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act requirement of notice-and-comment rulemaking; and (4) whether the district court’s universal preliminary injunction is impermissibly overbroad.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 06 2020 | Application (19A960) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
Mar 06 2020 | Response to application (19A960) requested by Justice Kagan, due Monday, March 9, by 4 p.m. ET. |
Mar 09 2020 | Response to application from respondents Innovation Law Lab, et al. filed. |
Mar 09 2020 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Immigration Reform Law Institute. |
Mar 10 2020 | Reply of applicants Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed. |
Mar 11 2020 | Application (19A960) referred to the Court. |
Mar 11 2020 | Application (19A960) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted, and the district court’s April 8, 2019 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Sotomayor would deny the application. |
Apr 10 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 14, 2020) |
Apr 22 2020 | Application of Innovation Law Lab, et al. for a further extension of time not accepted for filing. (April 23, 2020 - Corrected response extension request to be filed) |
Apr 23 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2020 to June 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Apr 24 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 15, 2020. See Rule 30.1. |
May 07 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 15, 2020 to July 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
May 07 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 15, 2020. |
Jul 15 2020 | Brief of respondents Innovation Law Lab, et al. in opposition filed. |
Jul 29 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
Jul 29 2020 | Reply of petitioners Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Oct 05 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020. |
Oct 13 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020. |
Oct 19 2020 | Petition GRANTED. |
Nov 23 2020 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. |
Nov 24 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 8, 2020. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 13, 2021. |
Dec 08 2020 | Joint appendix (two volumes) filed. |
Dec 08 2020 | Brief of petitioners Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed. |
Dec 31 2020 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 1, 2021. |
Jan 05 2021 | Motion for a further extension of time to file respondents' brief on the merits filed. |
Jan 07 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file respondents' brief on the merits is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2021. |
Jan 15 2021 | Brief of respondents Innovation Law Lab, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Professors of Civil Procedure and Federal Courts filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 21 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | CIRCULATED |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Nongovernmental Organizations and Law School Clinics filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Mila Sohoni filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Amicus brief of American Statistical Association not accepted for filing. (January 27, 2021 - to be reprinted and resubmitted) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of American Statistical Association filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Immigration and International Law Scholars filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of The Laredo Project and the National Immigrant Justice Center filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights, et al., filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council 119 filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 22 2021 | Brief amici curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., and Catholic Charities USA filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 25 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. |
Jan 28 2021 | Record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit electronic and located on Pacer. |
Feb 01 2021 | Motion to hold further briefing in abeyance and remove the case from the February 2021 argument calendar filed by petitioners. (Distributed) |
Feb 03 2021 | Motion to hold further briefing in abeyance and remove the case from the February 2021 argument calendar GRANTED. |
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
www.scotusblog.com
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
www.scotusblog.com
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
www.scotusblog.com
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.