Breaking News

ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on March 28, 2016
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1092 Fed. Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2015

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.

Issue: Whether and under what circumstances an inconsistency in expert testimony permits a court to set aside a jury verdict and grant the losing party judgment as a matter of law.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Dec 15 2015Application (15A632) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2015 to January 29, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Dec 16 2015Application (15A632) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 29, 2016.
Jan 15 2016Application (15A632) to extend further the time from January 29, 2016 to February 29, 2016, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 20 2016Application (15A632) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 29, 2016.
Feb 29 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2016)
Mar 8 2016Waiver of right of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated to respond filed.
Mar 9 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 25, 2016.
Mar 14 2016Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.
Mar 21 2016Letter dated March 21, 2016, from counsel for the petitioner received. (Distributed)
Mar 28 2016Petition DENIED.