|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-57||Fed. Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 17|
Issues: (1) Whether sales of energy through centralized market exchanges form direct contractual privity between buyers of that energy and the federal agencies selling it, such that the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over a suit to recover overcharges from the federal agencies; and (2) whether petitioners were in privity with the federal power marketing agencies for those sales because the energy exchanges acted as the parties' agents in facilitating their transactions.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 20 2017||Application (16A1019) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 7, 2017 to July 6, 2017, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|May 02 2017||Application (16A1019) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 6, 2017.|
|Jul 06 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 10, 2017)|
|Aug 02 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2017.|
|Aug 08 2017||Brief of respondents California, et al. in support filed.|
|Sep 11 2017||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Sep 26 2017||Reply of petitioners Pacific Gas and Electric Company, et al. filed.|
|Sep 27 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2017.|
|Oct 12 2017||Joint motion to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioners Pacific Gas & Electric Co., et al. and respondents United States, et al. (Distributed)|
|Oct 12 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 23 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2017.|
|Oct 30 2017||Joint motion to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Jun 08 2018||Motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 46 filed by petitioners.|
|Jun 13 2018||Consent to the motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 filed by respondent.|
|Jun 13 2018||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/