|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-361||4th Cir.||Oct 6, 2015||May 2, 2016||5-3||Alito||OT 2015|
Holding: A defendant may be convicted of conspiring to violate the Hobbs Act based on proof that he reached an agreement with the owner of the property in question to obtain that property under color of official right.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-3, in an opinion by Justice Alito on May 2, 2016. Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 16 2014||Application (14A59) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 26, 2014 to September 25, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 18 2014||Application (14A59) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 25, 2014.|
|Sep 25 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2014)|
|Oct 23 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 28, 2014.|
|Nov 24 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 29, 2014.|
|Dec 29 2014||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jan 13 2015||Reply of petitioner Samuel Ocasio filed.|
|Jan 14 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015.|
|Feb 23 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 27, 2015.|
|Mar 2 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 27 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 1, 2015.|
|Mar 27 2015||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 3, 2015.|
|May 20 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jun 1 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Jun 1 2015||Brief of petitioner Samuel Ocasio filed.|
|Jun 8 2015||Brief amici curiae of Former United States Attorneys filed.|
|Jun 8 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jul 29 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 6, 2015.|
|Jul 30 2015||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Aug 7 2015||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 12 2015||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
|Aug 31 2015||Reply of petitioner Samuel Ocasio filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 15 2015||Record received from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER with the exception of a SEALED electronic document.|
|Oct 6 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Ethan P. Davis, San Francisco, Cal. For respondent: Allon Kedem, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|May 2 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., joined.|
|Jun 3 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.