NuStar Energy Services Inc. v. ING Bank N.V.
Petition for certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 on October 17, 2019Linked with:
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether a party that physically supplies a vessel with fuel or other necessaries possesses a statutory maritime lien when the vessel owner or its authorized agent ordered those necessaries and directed the supplier to provide them, regardless of contractual relationships between the vessel owner and intermediate parties.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Mar 18 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2019) |
| Apr 05 2019 | Waiver of right of respondents Cosco Haifa Maritime Ltd., Cosco Auckland Maritime Ltd., Coscon and Cosco Venice Maritime Ltd. to respond filed. |
| Apr 09 2019 | Waiver of right of respondent ING Bank N.V. to respond filed. |
| Apr 23 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019. |
| Apr 25 2019 | Response Requested. (Due May 28, 2019) |
| May 15 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 28, 2019 to June 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| May 17 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 24, 2019, for all respondents. |
| Jun 24 2019 | Brief of respondent ING Bank N.V. in opposition filed. |
| Jun 24 2019 | Brief of respondents Cosco Haifa Maritime Ltd., et al. in opposition filed. |
| Jul 09 2019 | Reply of petitioner NuStar Energy Services, Inc. filed. |
| Jul 10 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019. |
| Sep 30 2019 | Motion to dismiss under Rule 46.2 filed. |
| Oct 17 2019 | Petition Dismissed - Rule 46. |
