|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1511||Ind. Ct. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether Miller v. Alabama applies to discretionary sentences of life without parole imposed for juvenile offenses, as 16 states have held, or whether it is limited to mandatory sentences of life without parole, as 10 others have found; and (2) whether an evidentiary hearing is required to assess whether juveniles sentenced before Miller are irreparably corrupt.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 05 2018||Application (17A952) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 19, 2018 to May 3, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Mar 08 2018||Application (17A952) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 3, 2018.|
|May 03 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2018)|
|May 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of Juvenile Law Center, et al. filed.|
|May 22 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Indiana Public Defender Council Juvenile Defense Project filed.|
|Jun 04 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 6, 2018 to August 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 08 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 6, 2018.|
|Aug 03 2018||Brief of respondent State of Indiana in opposition filed.|
|Aug 17 2018||Reply of petitioner Larry W. Newton filed.|
|Aug 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Sep 11 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 07 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Nov 29 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 03 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Feb 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 25 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.|
|Mar 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.|
|Feb 25 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Larry W. Newton filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Feb 27 2020||Supplemental brief of respondent State of Indiana filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Apr 22 2021||Supplemental brief of petitioner Larry W. Newton filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 26 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.|
|Apr 28 2021||Supplemental brief of respondent State of Indiana filed. (Distributed)|
|May 03 2021||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.