| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-1432 | 11th Cir. | Mar 2, 2020 | Jun 1, 2020 | 7-2 | Kavanaugh | OT 2019 |
Holding: Title 8 U. S. C. §§ 1252(a)(2)(C) and (D) do not preclude judicial review of a removable noncitizen’s factual challenges to an order denying relief under the international Convention Against Torture, which protects noncitizens from removal to a country where they would likely face torture.
Judgment: Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on June 1, 2020. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| May 14 2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2019) |
| May 14 2019 | Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system. |
| Jun 04 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 14, 2019 to July 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jun 05 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2019. |
| Jul 11 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2019 to August 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Jul 12 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 14, 2019. |
| Aug 08 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 14, 2019 to September 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Aug 09 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 9, 2019. |
| Sep 09 2019 | Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General in opposition filed. |
| Sep 25 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019. |
| Sep 25 2019 | Reply of petitioner Nidal Khalid Nasrallah filed. (Distributed) |
| Oct 15 2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019. |
| Oct 18 2019 | Petition GRANTED. |
| Oct 18 2019 | As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions. |
| Nov 18 2019 | Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. |
| Nov 20 2019 | Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 9, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 15, 2020. |
| Nov 26 2019 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 2, 2020. |
| Dec 09 2019 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed). |
| Dec 09 2019 | Brief of petitioner Nidal Khalid Nasrallah filed. |
| Dec 16 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Former Executive Office of Immigration Review Judges filed. |
| Dec 16 2019 | Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. |
| Dec 16 2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Legal Service Providers filed. |
| Jan 09 2020 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit. |
| Jan 15 2020 | Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General filed. |
| Jan 21 2020 | CIRCULATED |
| Jan 22 2020 | the record from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER |
| Feb 14 2020 | Reply of petitioner Nidal Khalid Nasrallah filed. (Distributed) |
| Mar 02 2020 | Argued. For petitioner: Paul Hughes, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. |
| Mar 10 2020 | Sealed documents were requested and electronically received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit. |
| Jun 01 2020 | Judgment REVERSED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined. |
| Jul 06 2020 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.

How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
www.scotusblog.com
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.