Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

On Tuesday, the court released opinions at 10:00 a.m. You can view a transcript of our live blog at this link.
On Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in United States v. Sineneng-Smith. Click to read our preview from Jack Chin.
On Wednesday, there is a possibility of opinions at 10:00 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:45 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Breaking News :

Breaking News :

N. E. v. Seattle School District

Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2017
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1285 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Issue: Whether an educational setting constitutes a child's “then-current educational placement” under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j) simply because it is the placement listed in an individualized education program drafted by the school district, when the parents objected to the portion of the IEP listing that placement, and the child never actually attended that placement.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Apr 24 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 30, 2017)
May 30 2017Brief of respondent Seattle School District in opposition filed.
Jun 06 2017Reply of petitioners N. E., By and Through His Parents, C. E., et ux., et al. filed.
Jun 14 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017.
Oct 02 2017Petition DENIED.
Term Snapshot
At a Glance