Musnuff v. Haeger
Case dismissed, pursuant to Rule 46, on October 25, 2016
Issue: Whether a federal court is required to tailor compensatory civil sanctions imposed under inherent powers to harm directly caused by sanctionable misconduct when the court does not afford sanctioned parties the protections of criminal due process.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Apr 28 2016 | Application (15A1124) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 16, 2016 to June 7, 2016, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
| May 4 2016 | Application (15A1124) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until June 7, 2016. |
| Jun 7 2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2016) |
| Jun 16 2016 | Waiver of right of respondents Graeme Hancok & Fennemore Craig, P. C. to respond filed. |
| Jul 11 2016 | Brief of respondents Leroy Haeger, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Jul 27 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
| Jul 27 2016 | Reply of petitioner Basil J. Musnuff filed. (Distributed) |
| Sep 29 2016 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 15-1406 is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. |
| Oct 17 2016 | Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received. |
| Oct 25 2016 | Petition Dismissed - Rule 46. |
