|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-547||6th Cir.||Apr 24, 2013||May 20, 2013||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2012|
Holding: Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on May 20, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 31 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 3, 2012)|
|Nov 27 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 2, 2013.|
|Dec 3 2012||Brief amici curiae of Indiana, et al. filed.|
|Dec 28 2012||Brief of respondent Burt Lancaster in opposition filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 2 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 18, 2013.|
|Jan 18 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 24, 2013|
|Feb 22 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 6th Circuit is electronic.|
|Mar 1 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Wayne County, Michigan filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 4 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Distributed) (Statement of costs filed)|
|Mar 4 2013||Brief of petitioner Linda Metrish, Warden filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 8 2013||CIRULATED|
|Mar 11 2013||Brief amici curiae of Indiana, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 20 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Apr 3 2013||Brief of respondent Burt Lancaster filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 5 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Apr 10 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 17 2013||Reply of petitioner Linda Metrish, Warden filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 24 2013||Argued. For petitioner: John J. Bursch, Michigan Solicitor General, Lansing, Mich. For respondent: Kenneth M. Mogill, Lake Orion, Mich.|
|May 20 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jun 21 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today, for the first time in 10 years, the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced the Cameras in the Courtroom Act, which would require video recording of Supreme Court oral arguments and opinion announcements.
Text - S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
Text for S.807 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Cameras in the Courtroom Act
In clash between private property rights and pro-union interests, the Supreme Court invalidates a California regulation that requires agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their property to speak with workers. SCOTUS says the regulation violates the 5th Amendment.
BREAKING: In major First Amendment case on student speech, the Supreme Court rules 8-1 in favor of a former high school student who was disciplined by her public school after sending a vulgar message on Snapchat complaining about the school's cheerleading squad.
In the second Supreme Court opinion of the day, the court holds that the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (which regulates Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac) is unconstitutional because of the limits on the president's ability to remove the agency's director.
The Supreme Court issues its opinion in the "hot pursuit" case -- a case about when police can follow a fleeing suspect into a home without a warrant. In an opinion by Kagan, the court declines to adopt a bright-line rule on "hot pursuits" of people suspected of misdemeanors.
The Supreme Court will release one or more opinions at 10:00 a.m. Join us on the live blog beginning at 9:45. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-wednesday-june-23/
After the Supreme Court handed down three opinions this morning, 12 cases remain outstanding for this term. They include voting rights, student free speech, and anonymous donors. We expect more opinions on Wednesday, June 23 at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We will open the live blog at 9:45.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.