|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-510||D.C. Cir.||Dec 1, 2015||Jan 25, 2016||9-0||Alito||OT 2015|
Holding: Equitable tolling is not available to preserve contract claims that were not timely presented to a federal contracting officer because there were no extraordinary circumstances beyond the tribe’s control: the tribe had unilateral authority to present its claims in a timely manner, and its claimed obstacles – a mistaken reliance on a putative class action and a belief that presentment was futile – were not outside the tribe’s control.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on January 25, 2016.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 3 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2014)|
|Dec 8 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 5, 2015.|
|Jan 5 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 4, 2015.|
|Feb 2 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 6, 2015.|
|Mar 4 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 6, 2015.|
|Mar 31 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 12, 2015.|
|May 8 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 26, 2015.|
|May 26 2015||Brief of respondents United States, et al. filed.|
|Jun 9 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.|
|Jun 25 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 29, 2015.|
|Jun 30 2015||Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether the D. C. Circuit misapplied this Court's Holland decision when it ruled that the Tribe was not entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for filing of Indian Self-Determination Act claims under the Contract Disputes Act?|
|Jul 29 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 2, 2015.|
|Jul 29 2015||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2015.|
|Sep 2 2015||Joint appendix filed (statement of costs filed).|
|Sep 2 2015||Brief of petitioner Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin filed.|
|Sep 9 2015||Brief amicus curiae of National Congress of American Indians filed.|
|Oct 9 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 1, 2015|
|Oct 19 2015||Proposal from respondent to lodge copies of claims filed with the Indian Health Service contracting officer and the related decisions of denial at issue in this case.|
|Oct 19 2015||Record requested from U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Oct 21 2015||Brief of respondents United States, et al. filed.|
|Oct 27 2015||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 19 2015||Reply of petitioner Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 1 2015||Argued. For petitioner: Geoffrey D. Strommer, Portland, Ore. For respondents: Ilana H. Eisenstein, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 25 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 26 2016||Judgment Issued|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.