Marilley v. Bonham
Petition for certiorari denied on October 10, 2017
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Issue: Whether the privileges and immunities clause of Article IV prohibits a State from preferentially subsidizing its own residents in the pursuit of a common calling governed by the clause, to the detriment of their nonresident competitors.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Mar 08 2017 | Application (16A881) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 21, 2017 to May 20, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
| Mar 09 2017 | Application (16A881) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until May 20, 2017. |
| May 19 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 22, 2017) |
| Jun 15 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 5, 2017. |
| Jun 22 2017 | Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. |
| Sep 05 2017 | Brief of respondent Charlton H. Bonham, Director of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in opposition filed. |
| Sep 20 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017. |
| Sep 20 2017 | Reply of petitioners Kevin Marilley, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Oct 10 2017 | Petition DENIED. |
