|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-872||7th Cir.||Oct 7, 2013||Oct 15, 2013||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2013|
Issue: Whether the Seventh Circuit erred in holding, in an acknowledged departure from the rule in at least four other circuits, that state and local government employees may avoid the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act’s comprehensive remedial regime by bringing age discrimination claims directly under the Equal Protection Clause and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Judgment: The writ of certiorari is dismissed at improvidently granted in a per curiam opinion on October 15, 2013.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 5 2012||Application (12A455) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 15, 2012 to January 14, 2013, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Nov 6 2012||Application (12A455) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 14, 2013.|
|Jan 14 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 15, 2013)|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief of respondent Harvey N. Levin in opposition filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief amici curiae of Michigan and Eleven Other States filed.|
|Feb 27 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 15, 2013.|
|Feb 27 2013||Reply of petitioners Lisa Madigan, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Apr 9 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of eitiher party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Apr 19 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including June 3, 2013.|
|Apr 19 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 2, 2013.|
|May 29 2013||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Lisa Madigan, et al.|
|Jun 3 2013||Brief of petitioners Lisa Madigan, et al. filed.|
|Jun 6 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Jun 10 2013||Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed.|
|Jun 10 2013||Brief amici curiae of Michigan and Twenty Other States filed.|
|Jun 10 2013||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Jun 24 2013||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.|
|Jul 22 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Jul 23 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, October 7, 2013.|
|Aug 2 2013||Brief of respondent Harvey N. Levin filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 5 2013||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 9 2013||Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 9 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 7th Circuit is electronic and is located on PACER. Record from U.S.D.C. for Northern District of Illinois is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Aug 9 2013||Brief amici curiae of AARP and National Senior Citizens Law Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 9 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Education Association filed.|
|Sep 3 2013||Reply of petitioners Lisa Madigan, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 7 2013||Argued. For petitioners: Michael Scodro, Illinois Solicitor General, Chicago, Ill. For respondent: Edward R. Theobald, III, Chicago, Ill.|
|Oct 15 2013||Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam.|
|Nov 18 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.