Los Angeles County v. Humphries
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09-350 | 9th Cir. | Oct 5, 2010 | Nov 30, 2010 | 8-0 | Breyer | OT 2010 |
Holding: Under the Supreme Court's decision in Monell v. New York City Dep't of Social Services (1978), a plaintiff who sues a local government for civil rights violations under federal law must show that his injury was the result of a policy or custom of the local government to obtain an injunction or a declaratory judgment. (Kagan, J., recused).
Plain English Holding: A person suing a city for violation of her civil rights must show that her rights were violated by a city policy (rather than by the unauthorized conduct of a city employee) to obtain any relief against the city, even if the plaintiff is seeking only an injunction or a declaration that her rights were violated. (Kagan, J., recused).
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer on November 30, 2010. (Kagan, J., recused).
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: Tying up a loose end in civil rights enforcement (Steven Schwinn, December 7, 2010)
- This Week at the Court: In Plain English (Lisa Tucker, December 3, 2010)
- Argument preview: What showing is required for declaratory relief and attorney's fees? (Anna Christensen, October 4, 2010)
- Clarifying jury selection (Lyle Denniston, February 22, 2010)
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs
- Brief for Petitioner Los Angeles County, California
- Brief for Respondents Craig Arthur Humphries and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Los Angeles County, California
Certiorari-Stage Documents
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Petitioner’s reply (unavailable)
Merits Briefs
- Brief for Petitioner Los Angeles County, California
- Brief for Respondents Craig Arthur Humphries and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Los Angeles County, California
Certiorari-Stage Documents
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)
- Petitioner’s reply (unavailable)