|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1077||D.C. Cir.||Dec 3, 2018||Mar 27, 2019||6-2||Breyer||OT 2018|
Holding: Dissemination of false or misleading statements with intent to defraud can fall within the scope of Securities and Exchange Commission Rules 10b–5(a) and (c), as well as the relevant statutory provisions, even if the disseminator cannot be held liable under Rule 10b–5(b).
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on March 27, 2019. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 15 2017||Application (17A657) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 28, 2017 to January 26, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Dec 19 2017||Application (17A657) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 26, 2018.|
|Jan 26 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2018)|
|Feb 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2018 to April 2, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 2, 2018.|
|Mar 26 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2018 to May 2, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 28 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 2, 2018.|
|May 02 2018||Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission in opposition filed.|
|May 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.|
|May 23 2018||Reply of petitioner Francis V. Lorenzo filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.|
|Jun 18 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 31 2018||Motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 31 2018||Motion to extend the time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 20, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 5, 2018.|
|Aug 20 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Aug 20 2018||Brief of petitioner Francis V. Lorenzo filed.|
|Aug 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Aug 27 2018||Amicus brief of Securities Law Professors not accepted for filing. (Duplicate submission - September 10, 2018)|
|Aug 27 2018||Brief amici curiae of Securities Law Professors filed.|
|Oct 05 2018||Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission filed.|
|Oct 05 2018||Motion to argue pro hac vice filed by respondent Securities and Exchange Commission.|
|Oct 09 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, December 3, 2018|
|Oct 12 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 15 2018||Record received from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Oct 19 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 19 2018||Justice Kavanaugh is recused in this case.|
|Oct 26 2018||Motion to argue pro hac vice filed by respondent GRANTED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Nov 01 2018||Reply of petitioner Francis V. Lorenzo filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 03 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Robert Heim, New York, N. Y.; For respondent: Christopher G. Michel, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (pro hac vice.)|
|Mar 27 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Kavanaugh, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.