Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):
          

Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-8369 10th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2019

Issue: Whether a dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Feb 05 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)
Apr 24 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
Apr 30 2019Response Requested. (Due May 30, 2019)
May 20 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 30, 2019 to July 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
May 23 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2019.
Jul 01 2019Brief of respondents Christina Ortiz-Marquez, et al. in opposition filed.
Jul 16 2019Reply of petitioner Arthur Lomax filed.
Jul 18 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
Oct 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
Oct 15 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
Oct 18 2019Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to the following question: Does a dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g)?
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards