Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-8327 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2017 |
Issue: Whether a district court may order an in personam forfeiture money judgment against an impecunious criminal defendant in the absence of a statute expressly authorizing such a form of punishment.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 10 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2017) |
Mar 21 2017 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
Mar 23 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017. |
Mar 28 2017 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received form counsel petitioner. |
Apr 05 2017 | Brief amicus curiae of Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers - Miami Chapter filed. (Distributed) |
Apr 11 2017 | Response Requested. (Due May 11, 2017) |
May 03 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 12, 2017. |
Jun 07 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 23, 2017. |
Jun 21 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 7, 2017. |
Jul 27 2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2017. |
Sep 11 2017 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Sep 21 2017 | Reply of petitioner Henry Lo filed. |
Sep 28 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2017. |
Oct 16 2017 | Petition DENIED. |