|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-438||4th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2012|
Issue: (1) Whether the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) bars courts from deciding the limits of federal power to enact a novel and unprecedented law that forces individuals into the stream of commerce and coerces employers to reorder their business to enter into a government-mandated and heavily regulated health insurance program when the challenged mandates are penalties, not taxes, where the government argues Congress never intended the AIA to apply, and where the petitioners are currently being forced to comply with various parts of the law and thus have no other alternative remedy but the present action; (2) whether Congress exceeded its enumerated powers by enacting a novel and unprecedented law that forces individuals who otherwise are not market participants to enter the stream of commerce and purchase a comprehensive but vaguely defined and burdensome health insurance product, and if so, to what extent can this essential part of the statutory scheme be severed; and (3) whether Congress exceeded its enumerated powers by enacting a novel and unprecedented law that forces private employers into the health insurance market and requires them to enter into third-party contracts to provide a comprehensive but a vaguely defined health insurance product to their employees and extended beneficiaries, and if so, to what extent can this essential part of the statutory scheme be severed.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 7 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 10, 2011)|
|Oct 18 2011||Brief of respondents Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. filed.|
|Oct 26 2011||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 10, 2011.|
|Oct 28 2011||Reply of petitioners Liberty University, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 9 2011||Letter of November 9, 2011, received from counsel for the petitioners. (Distributed)|
|Jun 25 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 28, 2012.|
|Jun 29 2012||Petition DENIED.|
|Jul 23 2012||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|Aug 9 2012||DISTRIBUTED.|
|Sep 17 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012.|
|Oct 1 2012||The respondents are requested to file a response to the petition for rehearing within 30 days (Response due October 31, 2012).|
|Oct 31 2012||Brief of respondents Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. filed.|
|Nov 5 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.|
|Nov 26 2012||The petition for rehearing is granted. The order entered June 29, 2012, denying the petition for a writ of certiorari is vacated. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U. S. ___ (2012).|
|Dec 28 2012||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...