|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1382||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether it was objectively unreasonable for the Georgia Supreme Court to find that no prejudice resulted from the failure of defense counsel to conduct any investigation and to present any mitigating evidence, including readily available and undisputed expert testimony that the defendant suffered from significantly diminished mental capacity constituting dementia at the time of the crime, when these failures deprived the jury of mitigating evidence that was essential to an individualized determination of the defendant’s culpability; and (2) whether prejudice must be presumed in a death penalty case when defense counsel fails to conduct any investigation of potential mitigating evidence, fails to offer any evidence during the penalty phase, and fails to subject the state’s penalty-phase witnesses to any cross-examination, thereby undermining the adversarial system and depriving the defendant and the fact-finder of any meaningful opportunity to conduct an individualized determination of the defendant’s culpability.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 18 2018||Application (17A759) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 30, 2018.|
|Jan 18 2018||Application (17A759) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2018 to March 30, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Mar 29 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 2, 2018)|
|May 02 2018||Brief of respondent Eric Sellers, Warden in opposition filed.|
|May 18 2018||Reply of petitioner Donnie Cleveland Lance filed.|
|May 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.|
|Jun 01 2018||Record Requested.|
|Jun 07 2018||Record received from U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit and U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Georgia. The record is electronic and available on PACER.|
|Jun 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Sep 18 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.|
|Oct 02 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 10 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Dec 03 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kagan join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
As a lawyer, Leondra Kruger argued 12 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court. As a California Supreme Court justice, she has a liberal-leaning record but has sometimes voted with more conservative colleagues in divided cases. Here's @AHoweBlogger's profile:
Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger - SCOTUSblog
During a 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate, then-candidate Joe Biden pledged that, if elected, he would nomi...
Two candidates to replace Breyer stand apart: Leondra Kruger and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kruger is six years younger. Jackson recently underwent a Senate confirmation. And the role of Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, may be pivotal.
How Biden will choose the next Supreme Court nominee - SCOTUSblog
With today’s reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer intends to retire, we now kick off our analysis of potentia...
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722