|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1382||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issues: (1) Whether it was objectively unreasonable for the Georgia Supreme Court to find that no prejudice resulted from the failure of defense counsel to conduct any investigation and to present any mitigating evidence, including readily available and undisputed expert testimony that the defendant suffered from significantly diminished mental capacity constituting dementia at the time of the crime, when these failures deprived the jury of mitigating evidence that was essential to an individualized determination of the defendant’s culpability; and (2) whether prejudice must be presumed in a death penalty case when defense counsel fails to conduct any investigation of potential mitigating evidence, fails to offer any evidence during the penalty phase, and fails to subject the state’s penalty-phase witnesses to any cross-examination, thereby undermining the adversarial system and depriving the defendant and the fact-finder of any meaningful opportunity to conduct an individualized determination of the defendant’s culpability.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 18 2018||Application (17A759) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 30, 2018.|
|Jan 18 2018||Application (17A759) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2018 to March 30, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Mar 29 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 2, 2018)|
|May 02 2018||Brief of respondent Eric Sellers, Warden in opposition filed.|
|May 18 2018||Reply of petitioner Donnie Cleveland Lance filed.|
|May 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.|
|Jun 01 2018||Record Requested.|
|Jun 07 2018||Record received from U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit and U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Georgia. The record is electronic and available on PACER.|
|Jun 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Sep 18 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 01 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.|
|Oct 02 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 09 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 10 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.|
|Dec 03 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kagan join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster