|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-529||10th Cir.||Apr 18, 2017||Jun 5, 2017||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2016|
Holding: Because disgorgement sought by the Securities and Exchange Commission operates as a penalty under 28 U.S.C. § 2462, in that it is imposed by the courts as a consequence for violating public laws and for punitive purposes, any claim for disgorgement in an SEC enforcement action must be commenced within five years of the date the claim accrued.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on June 5, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 18 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2016)|
|Nov 10 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 19, 2016.|
|Nov 18 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Dec 9 2016||Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission filed.|
|Dec 15 2016||Reply of petitioner Charles R. Kokesh filed.|
|Dec 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017.|
|Jan 9 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 13, 2017.|
|Jan 13 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 13 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Charles R. Kokesh.|
|Feb 17 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 18, 2017.|
|Feb 21 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Feb 22 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.|
|Feb 24 2017||Brief of petitioner Charles R. Kokesh filed.|
|Feb 27 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Mark Cuban filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of American Investment Council filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the American Petroleum Institute filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institue filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Donald R. Miller,Jr., in His Capacity as the Independent Executor of the Will and Estate of Charles J. Wyly,Jr. filed.|
|Mar 3 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Forfeiture Reform filed.|
|Mar 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 27 2017||Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 10 2017||Reply of petitioner Charles R. Kokesh filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 18 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Adam Unikowsky, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Elaine J. Goldenberg, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 5 2017||Judgment REVERSED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 7 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.