Breaking News

Karingithi v. Barr

Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2020
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-475 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issues: (1) Whether the government may commence removal proceedings by serving a noncitizen with a “notice to appear” that fails to specify the hearing’s time and place; and (2) whether deference under Auer v. Robbins allows an executive agency to interpret a regulation in a way that conflicts with a congressional statute.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jul 23 2019Application (19A104) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 6, 2019 to October 5, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Jul 23 2019Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Jul 25 2019Application (19A104) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 7, 2019.
Oct 07 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)
Oct 30 2019Brief amicus curiae of Lonny Hoffman filed.
Nov 12 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2019 to December 12, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Nov 14 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2019.
Dec 11 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2019 to January 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 12 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 13, 2020.
Jan 13 2020Brief of respondent Barr, William in opposition filed.
Jan 29 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
Jan 29 2020Reply of petitioner Serah Karingithi filed.
Feb 24 2020Petition DENIED.