|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether the First Amendment prohibits a state from criminalizing threats to commit violence communicated in reckless disregard of the risk of placing another in fear.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 17 2019||Application (19A697) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to February 24, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Dec 17 2019||Application (19A698) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to February 24, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Dec 26 2019||Application (19A698) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 24, 2020.|
|Dec 26 2019||Application (19A697) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 24, 2020.|
|Feb 20 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)|
|Mar 12 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 25, 2020 to April 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2020.|
|Mar 25 2020||Brief amici curiae of Kansas Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, et al. filed.|
|Mar 25 2020||Brief amici curiae of Virginia, et al. filed.|
|Apr 17 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2020 to May 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 8, 2020.|
|May 05 2020||Brief of Timothy C. Boettger, et al. in opposition not accepted for filing. (May 12, 2020)|
|May 05 2020||Brief of respondents Timothy C. Boettger, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 05 2020||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondents Timothy C. Boettger, et al.|
|May 14 2020||Letter from counsel for petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|May 18 2020||Reply of petitioner State of Kansas filed. (Distributed)|
|May 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.|
|Jun 22 2020||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondents GRANTED.|
|Jun 22 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion).|
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
The Supreme Court has rescinded its COVID-related orders related to filing, but no word on resuming in-person oral arguments in October.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.