|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether the First Amendment prohibits a state from criminalizing threats to commit violence communicated in reckless disregard of the risk of placing another in fear.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 17 2019||Application (19A697) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to February 24, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Dec 17 2019||Application (19A698) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to February 24, 2020, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Dec 26 2019||Application (19A698) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 24, 2020.|
|Dec 26 2019||Application (19A697) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 24, 2020.|
|Feb 20 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)|
|Mar 12 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 25, 2020 to April 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2020.|
|Mar 25 2020||Brief amici curiae of Kansas Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence, et al. filed.|
|Mar 25 2020||Brief amici curiae of Virginia, et al. filed.|
|Apr 17 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2020 to May 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 8, 2020.|
|May 05 2020||Brief of Timothy C. Boettger, et al. in opposition not accepted for filing. (May 12, 2020)|
|May 05 2020||Brief of respondents Timothy C. Boettger, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 05 2020||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondents Timothy C. Boettger, et al.|
|May 14 2020||Letter from counsel for petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|May 18 2020||Reply of petitioner State of Kansas filed. (Distributed)|
|May 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.|
|Jun 22 2020||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondents GRANTED.|
|Jun 22 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion).|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.