|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-1516||6th Cir. _||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: Whether it is an “adverse employment action” for a discrimination claim, or a “materially adverse action” for a retaliation claim, when an employer grants an employee’s request for a job transfer.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 18 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 21, 2014)|
|Jun 18 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counse for the petitioners.|
|Jul 17 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 20, 2014.|
|Jul 21 2014||Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.|
|Jul 21 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Michigan filed.|
|Aug 20 2014||Brief of respondents Robert Deleon, and Mae Deleon in opposition filed.|
|Aug 29 2014||Reply of petitioners Kalamazoo County Road Commission, et al. filed.|
|Sep 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|
|Sep 30 2014||Record Requested .|
|Oct 2 2014||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit. The record is electronic.|
|Oct 3 2014||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Western District of Michigan. The record is electronic.|
|Oct 6 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 10, 2014.|
|Oct 14 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 17, 2014.|
|Oct 27 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 31, 2014.|
|Nov 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 7, 2014.|
|Nov 10 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 14, 2014.|
|Nov 17 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 25, 2014.|
|Dec 1 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2014.|
|Dec 8 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2014.|
|Dec 29 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015.|
|Jan 12 2015||Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, dissenting from denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.